Saturday, December 21, 2019

Emily Dickinson International Society, Amherst Chapter, December, 2019


Emily Dickinson International Society, Amherst Chapter
December, 2019
Topic: Emily Dickinson’s Metaphor of “Home”
Facilitated by Melba Jensen


In addition to several poems, the conversation considered material from two of Dickinson's letters:
Austin Dickinson to Susan Gilbert (undated letter, @1854-1855
A home, Sue! It’s too beautiful a word for this world. It means too much – It’s an ideal realized by not one in a thousand – for it’s not a house & barn & orchard...It is the type & symbol of a heaven promised the followers of him who went about doing good. It is the center & spring of all living. It is the choice blossom of love – the beautiful answering of the dearest dream.

Emily Dickinson to Mrs. Holland, 1855
I cannot tell you how we moved…I took at the time a memorandum of my several sense, and also of my hat and coat, and my best shoes ­– but it was lost in the melee, and I am out with lanterns looking for myself.
Such wits as I reserved, are so badly shattered that repair is useless – and still I can’t help laughing at my own catastrophe.  I supposed we were going to make a “transit,” as heavenly bodies did – but we can budget by budget, as out fellows do, till we had fulfilled the pantomime contained in the word “moved.” It is a kind of gone-to-Kansas felling, and if I sat in a long wagon, with my family tied behind, I should suppose without doubt I was a party of emigrants!
They say that “home is where the heart is.” I think it is where the house is, and the adjacent buildings.

Melba. To me, "the choice blossom of love – the beautiful answering of the dearest dream" seem to be two slightly different ideas. Did that jar anyone else? Or do those two ideas just kind of dovetail and slide nicely together? Are they essentially parallel ideas, or are they different?
Victoria. They're sequential there. You have the blossom, that then unfolds as a manifestation of the dream - full flowering.
Melba. Yeah, every time I've read this up until now, they've seemed perfectly parallel. Then I thought, hm, there's something about the blossoming that seems more active than the dreaming.
Greg. Think of the blossom as the result.
Robert. "Bloom is result"
Melba. And that's the manifestation of the dream. So we've got a time sequence here. OK.
Jan. [in the second letter] What does she mean by budget by budget? What is out fellows?
Melba. I would guess that it might have been who was going to Kansas at that moment. This is the year that the New England Emigrant Aid Society is organizing wagon trains of emigrants to go from the northeast to settle out in Kansas. They were calling US citizens emigrants. The reason that they were going was that the Kansas-Nebraska act had established that Kansas would become a slave or a free state based on an election that was going to be determined by an undetermined process, voted on by an undetermined people at an undetermined time in the future. So, yeah, total bedlam. People were literally going out there to vote in this election. I think it [outfellows] was referring to the people who could actually go to Kansas, that they're so disconnected from their communities that they could just pick up and go.
Robert. They had to save money to buy the house, so, budget by budget might refer to that.
.....
Melba. I was struck by the contrast between the home as a symbol of heaven on earth to Dickinson, who seems to be so aware of the material reality of this pile of stuff that you keep around you that determines so much of who you are in the world.

Victoria. I love that and I am out with lanterns looking for myself.

Greg. You hear that quoted on tours a lot.

Judith. I see it as curious that she contrasts - at least I see it as a contrast - her several sense and the coat and the hat and the shoes. A holistic view there but the memorandum of my several sense makes me curious.

[A discussion of the history of the Dickinson homestead ensues, ]

Melba. So, with the full range of the possible meanings of "home," we can turn to the poems.

Larry reads.
A Door just opened
on a street -
I - lost - was passing by -
An instant's Width of
Warmth disclosed -
And Wealth - and Company -

The Door as instant shut -
And I -
I - lost - was passing by -
Lost doubly - but by
contrast - most -
Informing - Misery –
                        - Fr914

Greg. Melba, I noticed that you chose to include the line breaks; I wondered why.
Melba. Oh, well, because most of us have the Franklin, so I pulled these off of edickinson.org, just to see if having access to both versions - you know me, I never let a detail go unpursued. [laughter]
Victoria. I like that.
Robert. Its interesting; 439 - the first and second stanzas kind of capture A Door just opened.
Melba. Well, I don't think the next one is going to shed light on this, but it's certainly going to enrich our sense of the question.
Victoria reads.
Where Thou art - that -
is Home -
Cashmere - or Calvary - the same -
Degree - or Shame -
I scarce esteem Location's Name -
So I may Come -

What Thou dost - is Delight -
Bondage as Play - be sweet -
Imprisonment - Content -
And Sentence - Sacrament -
Just We two - meet -

Where Thou art not - is Wo -
Tho' Bands of Spices - row -
What Thou dost not - Despair -
Tho' Gabriel - praise me - Sir -
                                    - F749/J725/M376

Melba. I don't know about you, but this poem, initial interpretation didn't materialize; it was just initial questions. [laughter] So, any question people want to throw out?
Greg. Isn't this just a lovely other way of saying "I see heaven in your eyes, or, "you're heaven to me?"
Melba. So, for you, Thou is human. It's second person archaic plural. OK.
Greg. Oh. That does raise a question, doesn't it.
Melba. In Emily's day, it could also be direct addressed to God.
Judith. Especially capitalized.
Melba. Yeah, but it could be ambiguous. One of the problems of the poem is, is this addressed to a God? Is this addressed to a beloved person? Is it addressed kind of generically to both - a kind of an ode to Love. I see heaven in your eyes, and I'm not going to bother to clarify whether I'm addressing God or the Beloved.
Greg. Now, that's really interesting. I think that depends on the reader projecting onto the poem. I wonder if there's anything in here that could definitely establish whether she's talking to the Deity, or a person. Just because of who I am, I would read it as a person, but someone else, more spiritually oriented, might read it differently. Is there anything in the poem that will steer me one way or the other?
Victoria. Yeah, if you read it as a prayer. If you knew that you were saying it in a prayerful way, then it could be that you were addressing the divine.
Melba. OK, so that sort of turns it into a praise poem.
Polly. It would help so much if we knew whether she sent this to an individual or not.
Robert. Well, the variorum will tell us. The third line, Cashmere - or Calvary - the same - As I read that, it makes me think it's more of a person.
Jan. Thinking of your question before, she does what mystics have done through the ages - rhe two seem mutually exclusive - contrasting things so. So, Home - where we are is both pleasure and pain. Cashmere and Calvary. Degree, high, then Shame. Then Bondage as Play, sets up a paradox.
Polly. Whether it's good or bad, you are all things.
Jan. And then, if Just We two - meet, if it's a person, - it can be a person, but also the house of the divine. And then, Tho' Gabriel - praise me - Sir - I am elected to give birth - Gabriel is the angel of the anunciation, right?
Greg. "Blessed art thou among women."
Jan. Yes. [general agreement]
Melba. Popping the stack back to Polly's question, this was not in a fascicle, but there was no known recipient. You know, I'm trying to imagine a human speaker who would say that Imprisonent, conviction, Bondage were preferable to the absence of another human being. That's an interesting claim to me; It says, "As long as we can share the same cell, and be in bondage and have the same sentence, that's it - that's what I want."             REALLY!? [laughter]
Jan. She dares to go to the very extremes. We've talked about that before, right? Like, "God's hand is amputated;" We saw that a few times ago. Whew! She just uses these stark images.
Melba. I don't know, that's a little scary to me - this notion that as long as she can be in the prison with this beloved, that's enough.
Victoria. I think she's saying, if she had to be. If the circumstances were such that they were imprisoned, she would go there too. I will follow you to the deepest, darkest place, because my love is that strong. It's very hyperbolic, but that's just where Dickinson loves to go - all the way.
Greg. How about thinking of it in the sense of a committment. When we marry, we promise "for better or for worse." Not that I want to be in prison, but, if that's what happens, I'm sticking with you.
Victoria. Exactly.
Judith. Or, it could be arelationship that she's observed.
Greg. It doesn't have to be her.
Judith. It doesn't have to be her.
Melba. Yeah. Now I think we're really into the realm of the "supposed person." That this is a lyric written from a supposed person's point of view. I'm wondering, though, how people are reading the penultimat line - What Thou dost not - Despair, which I take to mean, what thou dost not demand, or be present for, is the speaker's despair about the loved one's absence. Then, she seems to qualify it. She says, Although Gabriel praise me.
Greg. How about, even though Gabriel praise me. [ general agreement ]
Jan. How about Tho' Bands of Spices - row?
Greg. Bands as in bands of gypsies. The air seems to be full of bands of spices. I think it's what's sometimes called an "imageless image." You can't construct a picture of it in your mind, nor translate it literally into something in our physical world.
Melba. The closest I could get was kind of waves of scent, wafting.
Greg. Nice.
Melba. And maybe row as in the sense of agita - vioplent. I'm wafting into your nose. Even if you don't want to smell how exotic I am, you're going to.
Polly. There's something very positive. Even though bands of spices were there, but you were not, then it is woe.
Melba. Right. "I couldn't possibly take pleasure in that."
Robert. That stanza, "I cannot live with you," reflects for me, "And were You lost, I would be/ Though My Name/ Rang Loudest/ On the Heavenly fame - " [J640/Fr706/M343 ]
Jan. In the last line, it's like, "I am the one being annunciated."
Melba. Oh, I didn't quite get that sense before. Wow. Quite a claim.
Jan. Thw two most enigmatic lines are always at the end.
Melba. Yeah, and if she's going to pull a reversal, it's going to show up here, which is why I'm so interested in that. OKm so, Gabriel is the Archangel who appears to reveal - who annunciates. I think he shows up in Daniel, to explain the meaning of Daniel's vision. In the Old Testament, he's also given the power to manipulate human actions and human events - earthly events, to bring about God's punishments or rewards. He's kind of the edgiest of the archangels, in the sense that he's the one that confers and withdraws the power to earthly actors. And apparently, he's also given control of serpents. - Fun Fact. [laughter] Serpents. This is a kind of loaded image in the Bible. This is a kind of edgy claim, that Gabriel is praising her.
Greg. "Even if he were to praise me."
Melba. Yeah, but even in the hypothetical, that's kind of edgy, because that says that either Gabriel is announcing her, as having some role in the world, or, that Gabriel has empowered her to speak truth or carry out some revelation.
Judith. Could she be trying to convince a lover? - that she is devoted? And that she is saying "Even if you don't, Gabriel has annointed me, in a way?
Greg. She did realize that Gabriel had annointed her, in a way.
Melba. I think she did.
Greg. "It was given to me by the gods/ When I was a little girl."
Judith. I don't know - on one level it sounds like a pleading.
Melba. Or possibly an acceptance that, "OK, if you can't be present to me, I still have this role that's been conferred on me. ... This might be expressing the death of her love for another human being, and I think it's certainly open to that reading, but I'm thinking that this is a very critical poem directed to God, saying, "My love for you would be so great, if we could just meet. BUT, since we can't, I'm going to carry on my mission of a new revelation.
Victoria. I don't know why it is, but I keep thinking of Elizabeth Barrett Browning, and the passionate love that the Brownings had, that she woulld have known about, and to me there's kind of an echoe, or a little bit of Browning and that very very famous love relationship. I can see how you could read it on either level, but this feels more human to me.
Melba. OK.
Greg. Hm. Yeah.
Larry. I have a question along the same line, because, if God pervades everything, then where are these places where he is not? It's more of a human object.
Victoria. Well, the places, I guess, where he is not, are those places that we perceive as hell.
Polly. Right, and I do think that this kind of love, that Emily was always longing for, was associated with the divine - there's no separation. That's what God is. She could never quite find it.
Melba. Yes, and I suspect that some of her homelessness is because she tied that kind of love to the concept of home. And, not being able to recognize that in the human world, she has to invent some other way of understanding home.
[interlude]
So, shall we turn to Myself was formed a Carpenter? Volunteers?
Polly reads.
Myself was formed — a Carpenter —
An unpretending time
My Plane — and I, together wrought
Before a Builder came —

To measure our attainments —
Had we the Art of Boards
Sufficiently developed — He'd hire us
At Halves —

My Tools took Human — Faces —
The Bench, where we had toiled —
Against the Man — persuaded —
We — Temples build — I said —
                                    - Fr475/J488/M236
Melba. This is where I see Dickinson trying to find her way into a different notion of home - something that's more dependent on her own actions. And, I love those lines, My Tools took Human — Faces —/ The Bench, where we had toiled — / Against the Man — persuaded —. I'll be damned if I can tell you what those mean. Any thoughts?
[ long silence ]
Judith. It's interesting that we is not capitalized in that second line.
Greg. I can understand the last half of it. A man was persuaded that she did indeed have the Art of Boards. But Tools with Human Faces is a tough one.
Polly. Can we think of her work as the building of poems? And, because she's a woman, it's always considered as Halves; it's not considered as significant as men's is. But when she said We Temples build, she knew it was good.
Greg. That's good, because if you think of her work as poems, and that poems are words, then it's a little easier to see them as having human faces; they kind of come alive.
Melba. And I wonder if she's seeing these characters, in each poem, as being a little "supposed person." That she's populating her own pantheon, or whether she's focused on the other authors whom she's reading and responding to. I'm not sure we can tell from the poem alone.
Victoria. Well yes, that's what came to me in the last poem, the Barrett Browning connection. She had her whole oevre in her head, so maybe this time she's seeing herself as a different kind of Carpenter than Jesus was. She had a message and it came through her poetry. He had a message of the gospel.
Melba. Which nicely handles the last line. She's building a Temple.
......
Melba. Well let me add on.
To my small Hearth His fire came—
And all my House aglow
Did fan and rock, with sudden light—
'Twas Sunrise—'twas the Sky—

Impanelled from no Summer brief—
With limit of Decay—
'Twas Noon—without the News of Night—
Nay, Nature, it was Day—

                                              - Fr703/J638/M341

So, I think if Dickinson found someplace to live, in her house, it was probably the hearth.
Judith. That's where she had the most intimate conversations with Austin, isn't it?
Melba. Yeah. Filling in Bacground, there's an author, Jean Mudge, looked into Emily's letters and found multiple references to sitting by the hearth in the pleasant street house and having conversations. I think they were early in the morning. This was a central hearth - one large chimney in the center of the house. It probably had fireplaces opening into multiple rooms, so this was really the center of the house.
Jan. That reminds me of Sue describing Emily as one who "sat by the light of her own fire."
Melba. I have to be careful about shoving Dickison's poems into great narrative arcs, but it seems to me that when she writes about home, she's usually mourning acknowledging, or mourning, some lack, or absence, or deficit. But when she starts writing about individual actions, or about craft, or about portions of the house, like the fireplace, then all of a sudden, she gives me a sense that she's really found a way of describing what she's doing. And a fire is something that's such a great metaphor, and it's something you interact with daily. You build fires, feed them, you keep them going. It's almost like she had to scale down the metaphor from home to something like a fireplace before she could make it into a suitable metaphor for herself and what she was doing.
Larry. So, we're looking at this as His fire not being just daylight - as provided by God - but a natural fire, in her heart?
Melba. Nominally, it's about the physical hearth, in the house, but I also think it takes on that other layer of meaning; It's my hearth that the fire came - in her own body that she's feeling glow and warmth.
Larry. What about this first stanza, where it's dawn, and then [second stanza] it's Noon? There's some kind of a development there, a time gap. What is that?
Melba. There is, and Dickinson has a very specific associations with the different times of day. I don't claim to fully understand them, but, I think for her, noon is when the day begins. In her poetry, days run noon to noonm not midnight to midnight. Noon is this moment when the sun is neither waxing nor waning. So, it always strikes me that noon for her is this moment of perfection, because it's moment of pure stasis. Greg, you're nodding.
Greg. Yeah, Rebecca Patterson on that Noon, Meridian, it's exactly what you're saying.
Melba. Feel free to elaborate. [Laughter]
Greg. It's figurative, not literally a time of day. You could have Noon at dawn.
Robert. "Antiquest felt at Noon/ When August burning low."
Judith. Sometime, when she wrote about the soul, it was masculin. I'm wondering if this is about her muse.
Melba. Yeah. When she refers to the poets, poets are "he." That's pretty consistent.
Judith. But, what's the News of Night? It's tempered that Noon.
Greg. It's without the News of Night.
Victoria. There was nothing to darken this perfect moment.
Judith. But I wonder, what's the News of Night?
Melba. Noon is when the sun is at it's height; It's all downhill from there, to night.
Victoria. There's a legalistic line, Impanelled from no Summer brief .
Several. Oh, yeah.
Victoria. So, this is coming down as a legal argument - a decision that this is the moment of perfection.

No comments:

Post a Comment